Bob750 wrote:If it's a tad rich, I'd let it be until break in is over. I was mostly curious if Jensen's mileage was being cited for a Hawk (250cc) or a 'hawk (305cc). It might stand to reason that a smaller engine gets better mileage, though I'm not sure about that if the bike the smaller engine is lugging around is the same size and weight as the one the 305 has to lug around. But I do think a Mustang with a 6 gets better mileage than one with a throaty V8, so...
At any rate your efficiency might go up once the break-in is done and the oil has been changed. That's what I'm hoping for with our Dream. It'd be nice if the 305 would get better mileage than my 750 Four...
LOL!!! I totally get that, Bob! My SV650S, 2006 model (I think it was) got 60+ MPG. Just silly. But then, it was liquid cooled and fuel injected - very efficient. The new SR400 Yamaha is touted to get 66, and it is also fuel injected. I would hope to expect at least 50 from the Old Girl, but she's carbureted, and she might not do that. As far as I know, the CB72 and CB77 were virtually identical, save for engine displacement. 350 pounds with a smaller engine? I don't know!!